Criticism
Volume 45, Number 1, Winter 2003
E-ISSN: 1536-0342 Print ISSN: 0011-1589
DOI: 10.1353/crt.2003.0035
E-ISSN: 1536-0342 Print ISSN: 0011-1589
DOI: 10.1353/crt.2003.0035
Tratner, Michael.
Working the Crowd: Movies and Mass Politics
Criticism - Volume 45, Number 1, Winter 2003, pp. 53-73
Wayne State University Press
Michael Tratner - Working the Crowd: Movies and Mass Politics -
Criticism 45:1 Criticism 45.1 (2003) 53-73
Working the Crowd: Movies and Mass Politics Michael Tratner GOING TO
THE MOVIES has always been in part an experience of joining a crowd:
picking up the buzz about the latest hit from friends and newspapers,
feeling the line surge forward as the velvet ropes are lifted, getting
carried along on a tide of rolling laughter. Yet film critics almost
never speak of crowds or crowd responses when they analyze movies. Film
theorists such as Christian Metz, Kaja Silverman, and Laura Mulvey go
so far as to claim that people at Hollywood movies react as if they
were utterly alone, each person becoming a spectator isolated in the
dark fantasizing about the stars on the screen. Though such theorists
often turn to social criticism, they repeatedly describe the audience
as if there were only one individual reacting, speaking in the singular
of "the Spectator," "the Male Gaze," the "All-Perceiving Subject," and
the "Voyeur," never of crowd responses or mass fantasies or even social
trends. Even critics such as Mary Anne Doane and Manthia Diawara who
have sought to broaden spectator theory by considering that audiences
may contain different kinds of spectators still treat these alternative
spectators as individuals reacting separately to movies. Part of the
reason critics have ignored the ways that movies elicit crowd responses
is that the dominant theory of...